On July 25, 2013, President of communist
Vietnam, Truong Tan Sang, met Obama at the White House, as an urgent
visit after seeing China leaders for 3 days in Beijing ending June 21.
The news reported the visit aimed to reinforce political trust,
friendship, and cooperation between the two Parties and States.
With President Barack Obama and Secretary of
State John Kerry, the talk was in the areas that have been discussed –
trade and military cooperation. Both also had discussion about human
rights that Obama included “the progress Vietnam is making and the
challenges that remain.” Sang shared a copy of Ho Chi Minh’s letter
marked February 28, 1946.
Why is that letter? What do those words mean
in that particular time? People would think that Ho was seeking help
from President Truman for political issues, but what were those issues
and the timely circulating events.
Ho begged to inform Truman “that in
course of conversation between Vietnam government and French
representatives the latter require the secession of Cochinchina...”
It is true that the Admiral Thierry d’Argenlieu, who was still in charge
of Indochina, would separate South Vietnam as autonomous state so that
Ho Chi Minh and France government couldn’t have the chance to unify the
three regions (3 kỳ unification).
In those early months of 1946, The France
Provisional Government was in the control of Prime Minister Felix Gouin
who was socialist, and Vice Maurice Thorez who also was Chairman of The
France Communist Party. Ho and French communists/socialists had come to
the discussion that ended with the signatures in “Franco-Vietnam
Agreement of March 6, 1946,” a week after a letter to Truman. Sainteny
was representative of France, Ho Chi Minh and Vu Hong Khanh of Vietnam,
but Khanh withdrew after finding out Ho had been an international
communist agent.
Obviously, d’Argenlieu, a
non-communist/socialist, didn’t cooperate with that group and his
intention to split South Vietnam out of their control. In this letter,
Ho seemingly sought Truman’s intervention to persuading d’Argenlieu.
Ho Chi Minh wrote “…the return of French
troops in Hanoi stop meanwhile French population and troops are making
active preparations for a coup de main in Hanoi and for military
aggression.” This accusation was
proved so wrong or Ho intentionally tried to cover up his true act that
was to sell Vietnam to foreigners as people in Hanoi calling him “Ho Chi
Minh Bán Nước” (Ho Chi Minh sells the country). Ho and French troops
were combined to against the nationalists.
Parts of The Agreement of March 6, 1946, include:
The French government recognizes the
Republic of Vietnam as a free state, having its own government,
parliament, army and treasury, belonging to the Indo-Chinese Federation
and to the French Union.
Concerning the unification of the three ky (Tonkin, Annam And
Cochin-China) , the French government binds itself to carry out the
decisions taken by the population through a referendum.
10,000 Vietnamese with their Vietnamese
cadres, under military control of Vietnam. 15,000 French, including the
French forces now located in the territories of Vietnam north of the
16th parallel. These elements must be composed solely of French
metropolitan origin, except for soldiers guarding Japanese prisoners.
These forces, as a whole, will be placed under supreme French command
with the assistance of Vietnamese representatives.
Ho Chi Minh
welcomed 15,000 French soldiers into Hai Phong then they were marching
to Hanoi. There were battles between the nationalists and French
soldiers while Viet Minh as back of.
Ho Chi Minh, Truong Chinh welcoming the return of French in March 1946
Source: Biography of Ho Chi Minh, Walter Cronkite
General Leclerc, Ho Chi Minh, Sainteny after signing the Agreement March 6, 1946
Source: Ho Chi Minh, Pierre Brocheux, 2007
Pay attention to the words “free state”. There was no word of “independence” in the entire Agreement.
Jean Lacouture, a French journalist, wrote in “ Ho Chi Minh, a Political Biography” 1967, (page 128):
The very next day (February 14, 1946), General Leclerc – who was the
acting high commissioner – sent a cable to his government, stating that a
settlement with the Vietminh was a matter of urgency and that to obtain
it they must be prepared to void the word “independence” without
further delay.
There were two main stumbling blocks. The
first was how to define and delimit the doc lap proclaimed in Hanoi on
September 2, some six months after a similar proclamation in Huế.
Lacouture reminded readers
the day of March 11, 1945 when king Bảo Đại proclaimed Vietnam
Independence after the French overthrown by the Japanese. Vietnam with
political vacuum in 9 days after the 2 bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima
(Aug 6 and 9, 1945), Viet Minh plundered the Trần Trọng Kim Government
and leading to September 2.
Ho would turn Vietnam into
part of Metropolitan France or France Union as long as they all in one
group with communist controlling.
True, once the general (
de Gaulle) had been replaced by Felix Gouin, and Soustelle (Minister
for Overseas Territories) by Moutet, things became somewhat easier for
the “liberal” group.…On February 16, 1946, Ho informed Sainteny
that he was ready to negotiate on the basis of membership of the French
Union; but he made no mention of the federation, nor did he abandon the
demand for independence. Sainteny passed the news on to Leclerc, who
urged Paris to accept.
In early June 1946, the French
representative Jean Sainteny escorted Ho Chi Minh from Biarritz to Paris
to attend the peace conference at Fontainebleau. Here Ho and Sainteny
await the arrival of their plane at the airport in Paris. Sainteny, in
his memoirs, noted that Ho Chi Minh appeared exceptionally nervous on
the occasion.
Source: Ho Chi Minh, William Duiker, 2000
Source: psywarrior.com
Ho’s effort in turning
Vietnam a member of French Union was dispersed by the Fontainebleau
Conference in France in the fall of 1946 when the communists and
socialists had lost the seats in congress. The Agreement had no place to
be realistic. The Mouvement Republicain Populaire (MRP) led by Georges
Bidault won the election entering a new chapter in the France of a
political era that first ended the colonialism to starting the war
against communism in Indochina in Dec 1946.
Archimedes Patti, director of OSS in 1945, in “Why Vietnam”, 1980, wrote (page 4) : Ho who was a master of understated diplomacy…This
statement would be very meaningful to the letter Trương handed to
Obama. One would ask why Ho Chi Minh had sent all together 8 letters in
those 2 years 1945 and 1946 to President Truman, but Ho received no
answer including this one. This puzzle is one of many more that have led
misconception about Ho Chi Minh’s attitude toward the United State. His
use of the U.S. Declaration of Independence was a way of persuasion,
not inspiration.
Bút Sử
August 9, 2013
Sources: Ho Chi Minh, A Political
Biography, Jean Lacouture, 1968; Vietnamgear.com; Ho Chi Minh, a life,
William Duiker, 2000; Ho Chi Minh, a Biography, Pierre Brocheux, 2007;
Why Vietnam, Archimedes Patti, 1980; Psywarrior.com; Biography of Ho Chi
Minh (video), Walter Cronkite.
Posted in: Chính Trị,Suy Ngẫm
Gửi email bài đăng này
BlogThis!
Chia sẻ lên Facebook
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét